Posts tagged as:

sustainability

My Moral Energy Hazard

by Keith on May 1, 2011 · 2 comments

Turning off the lights, setting the programmable thermostat and buying energy star appliances and CFLs; for the last 8 years I have been making these decisions largely driven by my conscious for resource conservation, not my wallet, due to the collective way I pay for utilities in my condo.   Essentially all utilities are pooled and then owners pay a percentage of the total based upon the square footage of their unit.  This creates a casebook example of moral hazard, meaning there is little or no relationship between the risk, or cost, someone bears and their usage or action.

Summertime Sweaters

I knew that this situation had to be fixed as electricity costs were the driving force behind increases to our monthly homeowner association fees (HOA fees), which are currently over $600/month for a 2-bedroom unit.  When you take into account that the HOA fee includes all utilities, insurance, common building maintenance – including the pool and gym, as well as services like the concierge and security it is really not too bad.  But seeing residents wearing sweaters in the summertime because their air-conditioning is cranked all the way up to a chilly 68, I knew that was not the behavior of someone who was paying for their own electric usage.

Knowing is Half the Battle
I am hopeful there is a straightforward solution to this problem: sub-metering of electric.  Last December our management company, Wentworth, at the urging of the Energy Committee, of which I am a member, invested in an electric sub-metering system that measures the use by each resident and then allows them to bill based upon actual usage, not square footage.  After 18 months of fits and starts we are on the cusp of rolling the program out and I could not be happier.   I recently got a “sample” invoice in the mail and while there is lots of room for improvement, I am at least happy to see that residents’ electric costs will now be tied to usage.

Understanding is the Other Half
While it is great that Wentworth has sub-metered the building and will be tying resident costs to their usage, the biggest issue here is communications and context, essentially marketing.  As you can see from my sample invoice above there are at least 3 areas in which it could be improved

1. How does this compare with the reduction I will see in my HOA fees?

- As it turns out through my extensive investigation these reductions are already known.  As such they should be communicated and compared to the bill residents are getting to show reductions/increases vs. what they were previously paying as part of the HOA fees.

2. How does this compare with other units like mine?

- Again this information is available but not being communicated.  The Wentworth team, through the Intech 21 system, has access to the entire building’s information including a comparison to each unit in a vertical section of the building.

3. What can I do to reduce my costs?

- Here is a missed opportunity.  ~50% of the residents will be paying more than their HOA reduction.  That is not good news for them, understandably so.  But instead of provoking anger, for any resident that will be paying more than they are saving in HOA reductions, Wentworth should be offering turnkey ideas on how to lower their usage such as: programmable thermostats, energy efficient appliances and lighting (CFLs), and blinds for south-facing units to limit solar gain in the summer.  Also offering to do a walk-through audit if requested would go a long way in building goodwill.

The lesson from this is that the technology part of the solution is just the first part; thinking through the challenges of how to most effectively communicate those changes is the critical second half, and unless Wentworth addresses the issues I have raised in the roll-out I am expecting an outcry by the residents.   Never doubt the importance of good marketing.

Resource Links:
Sub-Metering Company: Intech 21
CityView Management Company: Wentworth Management

{ 2 comments }

To Car or Not to Car?

by Keith on March 18, 2011 · 6 comments

Financial Savings
That is what we save every year by not having a car.  The final amount amazed me after running the numbers this week.   I sat down to analyze the situation as I am now two months into my new job and wanted to see if it made sense for Amy and me to consider purchasing a car. Maybe it would be more cost effective, after all the daily train tickets cost me $26.07[2] every time I go to my office in New Brunswick, New Jersey.  It also should not be surprising that I wanted to involve excel in this calculation, as I did with the Beast on our U.S./Canada road trip.

Once I factored in the cost of buying the car[1], maintenance, insurance, gas, and the loss of our monthly rent from our parking space, the cost of the train, Zip Car and occasional rental car didn’t even come close.  And that is with rather conservative assumptions on the cost of gas ($3.50/gallon) and car maintenance ($150/month).   The details are below and if anyone sees a mistake or an assumption that is out of whack, call me out on it in the comments below.  I want to ensure this analysis is robust and credible.

Carbon Savings
I also thought I would look at the carbon savings and impact of choosing to not have a car.  My research led me to CarbonFund.org,  where I was able to compare the carbon impact of my train commute vs the same commute in a car.  For this part of the analysis I only compared the 12,000 miles that would make up my commute to New Brunswick, New Jersey.  The other 8,000 miles we would use a personal car for are also likely to be used with Zip Car or rental cars for longer trips so no savings is to be had there.  Turns out the savings was much less than I had thought, only 1.72 tons saved each year.  And if I tried to “sell” that carbon credit, I would be able to “monitize” my carbon savings at current rates of $10/ton to a whopping $17.20 annually.

Time Savings
While the financial savings are great, and a big reason we will not be buying a car anytime soon, there is another great benefit to commuting on the train: not having to drive.  The benefit of not having to actively engage in your commute is huge when your commute is 2 hours each way. One of the first things I bought in my new job was an extended battery for my laptop so I am able to be productive while commuting.  I snapped the picture below of a fellow work day commuter who was also using the train time to polish a presentation.  On the days when I just can’t bear the idea of another powerpoint, I am able to sit and enjoy the scenery.

So are you ready to sell your car and take to the trains?  Can you make due without a car?  For most Americans that do not live in a city it is likely not possible, but understanding the costs you assume when choosing to live where you do is critical, and for us to move out of the city we need to understand that the need to have car is an expensive choice.


[1] I have assumed a 2011 Mazda 3 Grand Touring Hatchback, the new version of the car we had previously, for this analysis, including purchase price and MPG.

[2] Factors in tax impact of 21% reduction due to use of the pre-tax Commuter Check program offered by Johnson & Johnson.

{ 6 comments }

Organic Beauty

by Amy on January 9, 2011 · 1 comment

A half-priced blindfolded organic manicure, complete with accompanying mojito, is an offer that’s just too intriguing to pass up.  So when a good friend of mine called and asked if I wanted in on a deal being offered to Daily Candy subscribers, I jumped at the chance.  A few weeks later we found ourselves at Tierra Mia, the self-proclaimed first organic nail spa in the country.  Tierra Mia exclusively uses organic, water-based nail polishes, and the spa space is constructed from VOC-free recycled and sustainable materials.  Why does any of this matter?  Although many nail lacquers no longer contain formaldehyde, toluene and dibutyl phthalates (known as the “toxic trio”), there is evidence that the chemicals that remain in traditional nail polish pose health risks to both salon employees and customers.

With excellent reviews on Yelp, I was looking forward to what promised to be a unique manicure experience.

The Experience
Boy, was I disappointed.  I don’t know if the salon was overwhelmed with the Daily Candy response, or just poorly managed, but our appointment was double booked and we were asked to wait 45 minutes. Strike one.

When our manicurists were ready, we sat at lovely tables, offered mojitos, and had black cushy blindfolds placed over our eyes.  The sensory deprivation at first felt strange, but we quickly relaxed and settled into the experience.  Without my vision, my nose began to notice the lack of the chemical smell typical of nail salons.  Every so often our drinks were placed in our hands for sips between filing and soakings.  We were then asked for guidelines on the color we wanted.  That was part of the deal – not only do you give up your sight for the treatment, you give up exact color selection.  My guidelines seemed fairly straightforward to me: I have a law firm job interview in 2 days, so I need something very conservative and serious. Nothing fun.  In fact, the opposite of fun. When my blindfold was removed, it took a moment for my eyes to adjust. Then I saw my nails. Pink. Barbie pink.  And sparkling. I’m not entirely sure how pink and glitter qualify as conservative and serious, but beware that in the world of Tierra Mia, it does. Strike two.

The woman who did my nails offered to do a re-polish, but unfortunately due to the wait before our treatment, I didn’t have time to take her up on the offer.  My friend’s polish color worked out better for her, a beautiful dark navy color that was not dissimilar from the color she typically wears.

After our manicures, we were told to avoid any warm water on our hands until the next morning since although the water-based polish was dry, it wasn’t yet set.  I would have appreciated a heads-up on this one, since the restriction prevents showering, doing dishes or washing your hands for the rest of your day.  Luckily showering wasn’t an issue, and Keith handled any dishwashing that needed to be done.

Wear and Tear
Despite the poor color choice, I decided to keep the polish on (and hope no one noticed at the interview) and test drive the wear and tear.  Within two days I had chipping at the tips of my nails and flakes falling off at the sides.  By day three I gave up, bought non-acetone nail polish remover (required to get the stuff off) and began the process of soaking my nails and scraping them down with an orange stick provided complimentary by Tierra Mia.  It took about twenty minutes to get all of the polish off, and the whole process left my nails weak, peeling and cracking.  It’s been two weeks and my scratched up nails are still looking pretty ragged.  Strike three.

Conclusion
I am all for finding green alternatives to products that may be harmful.  And I am typically pretty laid back and able to overlook things like less than stellar service or poor color selection.  But with the list of mishaps piling up, and the poor quality of the manicure, I have to conclude that for me going organic isn’t worth the price, inconvenience or the resulting damage to my nails.  To avoid the chemicals found in traditional nail lacquer, I think I’d rather skip it altogether and opt for a good filing and buffing instead. Green is great, but if the product doesn’t perform, it’s just not something I’m willing to use.

{ 1 comment }